Fiction

The Terror Within

The Terror Within

Robyn O’Neil - The Edge of the World

Roland was an angry black man. Not just angry: the man was furious. He haunted Broadway between 82nd and 84th streets, where he made a habit of accosting white people. “Hey, help me out? You, give me some money?” he’d shout at them. He ignored the bourgeois conventions that encourage people to keep their distance. He was in your face. This was at a time in New York City when such encounters were not uncommon. The American Civil Liberties Union fought heroically for the right of insane people to live on the street, which also meant their right to harass people and to piss and shit on the sidewalk.

Roland was an exceptionally handsome man with strong features. He was the color of sable and had an athletic build. He could have been a model for Robert Mapplethorpe or even Ralph Lauren, it was bad luck that Roland never met either man.

One day I came across Roland terrorizing an ancient couple. I went to their aid and asked Roland why he was yelling at them. He was surprised and left them alone. He turned to me and asked, “Are you going to give me some money?” I told him no and he answered, “Then get the fuck away from me before I hurt you.” For whatever reason, I held my ground, “I don’t understand. If you want people to give you money, why do you yell at them? Why do you terrorize them?” To my surprise he answered, “Because I don’t like having to ask for it.”

That’s how my friendship with Roland began.

For a year or so I’d buy us sandwiches at Zabar’s. We’d sit in the center meridian and discuss the films of Sam Peckinpah and Akira Kurosawa. We both thought The Wild Bunch was an elegiac masterpiece. We both thought Seven Samurai was magnificent. Roland had wept when Kikuchiyo was killed. He even wept when he described the scene.

Roland was an educated, thoughtful and articulate man. He had a degree from Brooklyn College, an ex-wife, a daughter enrolled at the University of Texas (whom he hadn’t spoken to since he was paroled in 1995). It was an old story: he had been a successful drug dealer, first marijuana then cocaine. He became an addict. Then he became a thief. He was arrested for armed robbery. He served his time and was released. He stored his clothes with distant relatives. He slept in flophouses when he had the money and on the street when he didn’t.

The street would kill him, but it took its time. When the weather was brutal, he’d stop at my building and I’d get a nervous call from the doorman. I’d come down and give him $20 to get a room. One particularly stormy night, he arrived after midnight and asked to come up. I told the doorman it was okay. The doorman asked me, in deference to my neighbors, to come down and bring him up. Roland was drenched. He was also sick with that harsh street cough. He had long ago lost his sable sheen and was now a scuffed brown. I made him a cup of coffee. He asked if he could stay the night. I had just begun to see Charlotte and she was waiting for me in the bedroom so I told him no. I told him no 20 times. He finished a second cup of coffee while I went and got him a heavy sweater and an umbrella. As I walked him out I gave him $20 to get a room.

The next time I saw Roland was at Saint Luke’s. He weighed next to nothing. He was a gray man. He laughed at his predicament, but he wasn’t happy.

He did like his room though, a private room in the new wing of the hospital. Roland had stomach cancer and it wasn’t going away.

One day Roland called. “I’m bored.” He then asked if he could live with me when he was released. “It won’t cost you a cent. In fact, you’ll make out like John Gotti.” He explained that once he was released the state would pay his rent and expenses. “I’ll sign it all over to you, and you’ll live rent free.”

I told him no. I told him no. I told him I’d think about it.

He called me the next day. “Did you think about it?”

“No.”

“Well think about it.”

Alexander Petrosyan and Robyn O'Neil


“I’ll think about it.

“We’re friends, right?”

“We’re friends.”

“Then think about it. Are you coming to see me today?”

Alexander Petrosyan


I told him I would and he said, “Do me a favor. When you come up, bring me a Big Mac, a pack of Kool Menthols and the Post.”

“You want cigarettes?”

“I’m bored to death, man, and don’t forget the Post. And make it two Big Macs.”

A few hours later I went to see Roland with two Big Macs and a pack of Kools wrapped in the New York Post. He had shrunken to the point that I almost didn’t see him. I helped him up from his bed and watched him limp into the bathroom dragging his IV stand with him. He smoked a couple of cigarettes behind the closed door.

I asked him if they would mind that he was smoking.

“What would they say to me? I’m one fierce nigger,” he sniggered. “Man, I’m dying. All they want is for me to vacate the room.”

I left and promised to return the next day with a Big Mac and an apple pie.

A week later, Roland called to say they were moving him to a hospice in the Bronx. “I told you, man. I told you I was dying. This is it. You’ll come and see me.” I think he was crying. A few days later I went to LA on business, and when I returned home there was no message from Roland. I got caught up in things and another week passed. Another week. Finally I called the hospice and asked to speak to Mr. Roland Green.

“Oh, Mr. Green,” the nurse answered. “Mr. Green is no longer with us.”

“Well,” I said, “I’m a friend of his and was wondering if you could tell me how I can get in touch with him.”

She replied, “Mr. Green is no longer with us.”

“Yes, I heard you. He’s no longer with you, but could you tell me …”

She cut me off. “I’m sorry sir, the man is dead. Mr. Green is dead. He died last week.”

Barba


Robert Sawyer is a brand strategist, creative director and the author of Kiss & Sell: Writing for Advertising.

Support + Share

Help us spread the word. Share it online with your friends or subscribe to the print edition.

Adbusters #84 July/August 2009

Nihilism and Revolution

All Comments

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
October
31, 2009
01:18 am
Link

I was not surprised by anything in this story. On an ethical level, there was nothing to be learned. On an aesthetic level, the story was ugly, but not ugly in a good way...just ugly. It seems to me that the author was simply out to make a buck, gain some recognition, hype his company. Jesus, you guys, this was awful. What is the fucking point of AdBusters anyway? You show pictures of cops beating peoples' heads in with cutesy captions underneath and think you're making a difference. Like we don't all know the world is fucked.

October
08, 2009
12:55 am
Link

Someone should have done America a favor and put a bullet in this tapeworm's head long a go.
It is this type of "I am owed" crap that is running America into the ground.
Think how much taxpayer money was wasted over the years on this worthless excuse of a human when a
ten cent bullet could have set things right years ago.

October
08, 2009
12:51 am
Link

Wow, that liberal retard was a genius, friendship = "gibs me dat" for niggers. The black animal kept the white guy around because the white guy was giving the animal attention and food. The story as old as time is a black wanting everything given to it and then not being grateful. You know, the blacks didn't even earn freedom from whites, whites gave it to them and they weren't thankful. They weren't thankful for the whites taking the slaves from Africa, a shithole, and moving the animals to the US. And yes, the blacks sold other blacks into slavery. And finally, the animals aren't thankful even after extorting whites, latinos, and asians for trillions of taxpayer dollars spent on nigger university, "social" (black) programs, and blackfirmitive action. I'm sick and tired and I just don't feel bad for blacks anymore. If you ask me, they honestly do deserve what they get. By the way, I'm not white and yes I am racist, but only against blacks. Yes there is something like 10% of blacks that maybe can achieve, and by achieve I mean not be criminals and do a little work, but they can never make up for the 40% of welfare niggers take up, 60% of the animals in some stage of the correctional system, and huge percentage of crime niggers commit. I'll go ahead and say it, no other group would so positively affect the US by its removal as removing blacks. Our debt, crime, and overcrowding would disappear almost overnight. And don't say you feel sorry for me, I feel sorry for you. Because you liberal idiots will continue to fund the inferior animal and not open your eyes to the obvious statistics. You'll try to help a black and end up getting stabbed in the back, or raped, etc. I'll stay away try and help, but I'm not going to feel sorry for you liberal idiots either. Have fun in your nigger loving world and I hope you realize before its too late and we tax paying asians, whites, and latinos are funding an inferior species that can never amount to the same greatness we've achieved.

October
07, 2009
09:37 pm
Link

The gibs me dat these apes expect from whites is disgusting. If that monkey had approached me on the street I'd give him nothing but a middle finger.

October
07, 2009
05:42 pm
Link

Hooray, I love happy endings! :) What a heart inspiring load of crap! Typical nigger behavior. Give me money! Give me! Give me! Give me everything free!

October
07, 2009
06:02 pm
Link

White folks need to take a stand against that type of behavior! All of those feral beasts want something for nothing. Wake up white America!

October
07, 2009
11:03 am
Link

Didn't you ever learn not to feed garbage bears?

The same thing applies to street jigs; by giving him the Kools and other supplies he demanded, you just furthered the "gibs me dat" mentality.

Disgusting liberal.

August
14, 2009
07:46 am
Link
Apart from anything else, this is a really superb piece of prose–-literature, even.
August
12, 2009
09:48 pm
Link
I’m amazed by how cold some of these responses are, given the bravery of the author, and in taking the time and compassion to understand this lonely soul. If everyone had this kind of feeling the world would be much more friendly and welcoming. Too often friendships are lost because of an inability to deal with someone’s mental illness. Kudos for stepping out of the heartlessness of the city, you are indeed a gifted individual.
July
24, 2009
02:25 am
Link
The intersection of two disparate lives…..A meditation on death’s proximity to us all….. A brilliant little gem of a tale, with not a wasted word or sentiment. How many of us have taken the fateful turn of approaching a street dweller, and letting the dynamic of the relationship run its natural course? Not many, I would venture. And for good reason, no doubt. But these intersections— recalling one of my own as well as the author’s—are memorable and take us to another level of communion with another. Because they involve emotional risk and possibly physical danger. The Terror Within, indeed. Of death. Of loneliness. Of fear. Of contact with the other—a stranger who turns out to be recognizable after all. There but for the grace of God go I, Roland. Dream a new dream. —CS
July
20, 2009
10:09 pm
Link
A moving story, well written and heart felt — indeed, a memento mori. We should all remember the lessons of your story. SAL
July
21, 2009
01:22 pm
Link
Dear Sal, As the writer of this story I want to thank you for your kind words and also bringing up the notion of “lessons.” Minutes ago, I received a call from a friend who lives on a farm it Wisconsin, figuratively a million miles from the City, and that is the question he had for me after reading the story was What did I learn from the experience? I wish I had an answer for him. I still don’t know what lesson to learn from my friendship Roland, or why it was necessary I learn it? In closing, thank you again taking the time to comment, and also reminding me of the notion of “memento mori.” Robert
July
20, 2009
10:59 am
Link
I think this is a very honest account of how we relate to people that we’re not 100% comfortable with. No matter how close you feel to these people your always remember what they are capable of. I’ve also know people (friends even) that I would not trust to allow them to stay for the night so I understand exactly the predicament the author found himself in.
July
20, 2009
02:19 am
Link
There’s no guts to this, just a simple sad story. what’s this about, honor your friends and commitments? this story gets told all the time. it’s sad and true, and hollow.

Take advantage of the first home buyers grant in sydney contact sydney mortgage broker
July
17, 2009
02:20 pm
Link
I found this story quite by accident as I was browsing this site in an attempt to figure it out. I must say that it’s easy for some people to throw bricks when they aren’t walking in another man’s shoes. In this case, there are those who want to vilify the author for not doing enough to help his friend. And then there are those who have no sympathy for the homeless man since choices he made placed him in the circumstances he was in. Perhaps a little of both is true and each of us should look at ourselves and determine how we measure up in each of those elements of behavior. Do we have friends that we don’t contact as often as we should if we endeavor to call them friend? Do we assist them in their time of need when it is convenient or are we willing to make sacrifices? Do we make bad choices and expect others to bail us out? Do we repeat behaviors that we know are bad for us? Do we make unreasonable demands on others? Ultimately, we should perhaps have some sympathy for each of them, Roland for the condition he was in and the lack of a path for change. And Robert who I am sure at the realization that he would not have another opportunity to embrace his friend, felt both sorrow and remorse.
July
16, 2009
11:00 am
Link
The story—chronicle, really—is dazzling. It captures the character and predicament of the kind of person we cross the street to avoid. It is written in a clear-eyed, cool style, avoiding bathos or condescension. I am amazed at how many posters approach the piece, not to experience it, but to use it a pretext for airing biases and exhibiting their lofty self-regard. Roland, it appears, was just one crank among many.
July
16, 2009
09:59 am
Link
it’s sad and true, and hollow” It sure is. But I think that’s exactly why stories like this most need to be told. As long as the Rolands of the world continue to be, essentially, nameless and faceless and disposable the world will never really be anything but sad and hollow. That’s why I am amazed at the number of people being critical of the author. Come on, folks! These sort of small stories are really the only way to give a voice to people who would otherwise just slip into obscurity. I think the author was being truthful in his recounting… I mean… he comes off as a bit of an ass in his own tale. Take what you want from it or take nothing at all. After all, we live in a decidedly post-modern sort of world, and this is a decidedly post-modern bit of writing.
July
14, 2009
05:37 pm
Link
You’re whats wrong with the world today
July
14, 2009
05:31 pm
Link
I’m tired of this whole New Age Save the World campaign. I take care of myself and expect others to take care of themselves. I read the story and the comments and it sounds like the guy made some choices that put him where he ended up. He was no hero, why should he even be remembered?
July
19, 2009
11:17 am
Link
the problem this days is that some ppl always expecting to be saved.. god will save us.. government will help… military will come… guess what: no chance in hell that all those things will happening in useful time
July
14, 2009
05:00 pm
Link
I also remember Roland and anyone living on upper west broadway in the late 1980s might remember him too. He was a mean sonofabitch—the last person you’d want to open your heart or wallet to. He walked the streets and terrorized people. When I spotted him from afar I quickly made a detour to avoid him. The writer had the sensitivity, compassion, and bravery to get to know this man. And I feel awed, if what the writer wrote was true, to read that he was an educated man. So much for stereotypes. Roland is remembered today and his passing is sad but this writer, by his actions, memory and writing about it has preserved the dignity of a man who died homeless.
July
14, 2009
08:45 am
Link
Coincidentally, I have a very good friend with a similar name. He’s quite a romantic, and I think he would appreciate this story a lot. - Pauli
July
13, 2009
05:58 pm
Link
I remember Roland…he was a monster! I’m glad he found a friend in the writer who wrote a moving story about his encounters with a human being without being sentimental or manipulative.
July
14, 2009
09:04 am
Link
A monster? I don’t know? Certainly he could be perceived, at a distance, as one. (One often heard him before seeing him.) He certainly was frightening and to frighten the gentle inhabitants and grazing consumers of Broadway in the Upper 80s, was certainly his intent, his strategy. But, as I wrote, he was a very angry and alienated man, but beyond his shouting and verbal abuse, I don’t know if he ever threatened anyone with physical harm. Which is not to say one would have been wrong to consider him dangerous. At the time of my friendship with Roland, he was one of countless men and women living on the streets of New York, some of whom were nearly invisible, others offensive and still others who were actually dangerous. Roland was a complex person and one whose company I came to enjoy. Did I ever trust him entirely? No? Was I ever afraid he was hustling me? At first yes; later, no. As someone who lives or had lived in New York, you know how quickly relations can be formed and just how quickly they can end. In the end, did I consider him a friend? Did I disappoint him in the end? That is for the reader to conclude. In closing, thank you for your comments. They express much of what I hoped to achieve.
July
13, 2009
05:37 pm
Link
The title and picture (evidently of a victim of gang violence) seem incongruous with the story. I was expecting something different… but I liked it, anyway, for being straightforward, honest, and even humble given the apparent ambivalence of the author towards Roland in Roland’s darkest moments. It is simple and easy for someone to objectify the homeless people one meets - to turn them into obstacles one must get around, instead of people who have their own stories to tell. The myriad fears and assumptions (which one may pretend do not exist, when one is at a safe, comfy distance) that suburbanites, tourists, and most members of the middle- and upper-class bring to the streets with them, en route to their businesses or vacation sightseeing destinations or favorite restaurants, will become more firmly and deeply entrenched on account of a natural human confirmation bias unless that impulse is intentionally opposed. It takes a person of real worth and character to combat the stereotypes in his own mind, even to act against them in ways that don’t offer themselves up for evaluation by our peers - but the end result is the guarantee of the conditions of the possibility of seeing other people as really being other people, and not ‘things’ to be avoided or managed. That’s humanizing; that’s life-affirming; that’s doing the tough work of real love for others in spite of the convenience, ease, and forcefulness of the alternative. And it’s also necessary to make this infinitely personal move, in an age of ersatz charity and pseudo-compassion writ large, offering a stylish way to dance around the necessary transformation of the subjective stance towards all kinds of people in need. Product red, Starbucks convenience philanthropy and the like, all are simply devices being used to sell products with a sentimental moral-ish edge over the competition, keeping those in need at an abstracted arm’s length so that those consumers don’t need to even think about the sights and smells of real poverty. Buying a “charity” mocha, thereby sending a dollar to Africa, is a disgusting tacit endorsement of normative apathy - it trivializes the need, makes it a chic, hip fashion accessory to give without giving, it gives the psychological benefit of charity without requiring any work or tangible involvement at all, it doesn’t make any demands on a person’s heart. And that’s where real things start to happen - in the determined transformation of one’s heart, one’s subjective stance, the realigning of allegiances to one’s fellow man instead of the unspoken ideals of western secular hedonism. If we really had hearts for others, and not just the outward saccharine displays of affectation for the eyes of those we want to impress, maybe, just maybe, something miraculous could happen for a few people who got dealt a tough hand in this ultimate game of chance we call life. All that to say, thanks for not playing up your own part in Roland’s story, Mr Author, and for giving Roland a space to be thought of as a person with a story of his own. At the end of the day, if you hadn’t written anything, it seems Roland would have become a slight memory for only a few people, and another stat in a world of meaningless stats. -MW
July
13, 2009
03:13 pm
Link
DEFY APATHY.
July
13, 2009
10:55 am
Link
Robert Sawyer is a brand strategist, creative director and the author of Kiss & Sell: Writing for Advertising. Hmmmm, did that really happen, I’m thinking this guy is some kind of fraud let’s look at the subversive marketing that was going on in this article. could have been a model for Robert Mapplethorpe or even Ralph Lauren, it was bad luck that Roland never met either man. For a year or so I’d buy us sandwiches at Zabar’s The Wild Bunch and Seven Samurai Brooklyn College and University of Texas New York Post and Kool cigarettes big Mac’s Could of been true or could of been trying to manipulate. Somehow I doubt this guy Robert Sawyer is throwing $20 bills at the black homeless and inviting them up to his apartment. Although anything is possible. I guess.
July
13, 2009
12:36 pm
Link
As the writer of the story, I can attest that it is a true story, even if I am a brand strategist and work in advertising. As for the proper names and brand names used in the piece. I challenge you to tell a story in 2009, that isn’t constructed of named places, objects and events. In any event, I want to make clear that I was never in the habit off “throwing $20 at the Black Homeless,” but I have, in the past, handed $20 bills and $10 and $5 to number of people, when I felt it appropriate. In closing, I am delighted you read through the story all the way to the credit; and thought about it to the point of wondering if I weren’t a fraud and the story invented. As a writer, I can’t ask for more. In closing, I would like add that quite a few brand strategists and admen/women are thoroughly decent people and that many of us have interesting stories to tell.
July
13, 2009
03:40 am
Link
yes, i agree with the last commenter. what was the point of the story? with such a great title, and interesting opening paragraph i was expecting more than this story delivered. you let your “friend” down during the cruelest, harshest days of his life. i am not in your position, but writers like you remind me of what are called “culture vultures”. you feign interest in someone long enough for a good story, then to hell with them. i am let down by this story. i am angered by this story. but then again, maybe that is the point - posted by “cherryl was here” from www.thelastnerve.com. i am not “anonymous” but this bullisht comment system is going to say that i am “anonymous” anyway. go figure.
July
13, 2009
12:45 pm
Link
Cherryl was her,” As the author of this story let me first thank you for reading iy and then sharing your response. As for whether or not I let Roland down, I haven’t an answer. I suspect I’ve let many people down and will, in the future, disappoint others. Roland was a small, if regular, part of my life and landscape for a relatively short period of time—that is at the heart of the story. I am touched you were moved by Roland’s suffering and loneliness, perhaps that what I wanted—writers never know what they want, or what they achieve for that matter. I do want to say I never feigned interest in the man, but as the story makes clear, the nature of our friendship had limits, some defined by me, some by others. It is very hard to be one’s brother’s keeper, at best we can be friends and, if that means to occasionally disappoint someone, then that is part of the nature of friendship, too. Robert

We are a global network of culture jammers and creatives working to change the way information flows, the way corporations wield power, and the way meaning is produced in our society.

Now 84,753 strong!

Join Us >>

TOOLS FOR ACTIVISTS

What's This?

RECENT ADBUSTERS MAGAZINES

Logo Small