Excerpt

Saving Civilization

Saving Civilization

Saving civilization will take a massive mobilization, and at wartime speed. The closest analogy is

the belated US mobilization during World War II. But unlike that chapter in history, in which one country totally restructured its economy, the Plan B mobilization requires decisive action on a global scale.

On the climate front, official attention has now shifted to negotiating a post-Kyoto protocol to reduce carbon emissions. But that will take years. We need to act now. There is simply not time for years of negotiations and then more years for ratification of another international agreement.

It is time for individual countries to take the initiative on their own. Former Prime Minister Helen Clark of New Zealand led the way. In late 2007 she announced that New Zealand would boost the renewable share of its electricity from 70 percent, mostly hydro and geothermal, to 90 percent by 2025. The country plans to cut per capita carbon emissions from transport in half by 2040. Beyond this, New Zealand plans to expand its forested area by some 250,000 hectares by 2020, ultimately sequestering roughly 1 million tons of carbon per year.

We know from our analysis of global warming, from the accelerating deterioration of the economy’s ecological supports and from our projections of future resource use in China that the Western economic model – the fossil fuel-based, automobile-centered, throwaway economy– will not last much longer. We need to build a new economy, one that will be powered by renewable sources of energy, that will have a diversified transport system and that will reuse and recycle everything.

We can describe this new economy in some detail. The question is how to get from here to there before time runs out. Can we reach the political tipping points that will enable us to cut carbon emissions before we reach the ecological tipping points where the melting of the Himalayan glaciers becomes irreversible? Will we be able to halt the deforestation of the Amazon before it dries out, becomes vulnerable to fire and turns into wasteland?

What if, for example, three years from now scientists announced that we have waited too long to cut carbon emissions and that the melting of the Greenland ice sheet is irreversible? How would the realization that we are responsible for a coming 7-meter (23-foot) rise in sea level and hundreds of millions of refugees from rising seas affect us? How would it affect our sense of self, our sense of who we are? It could trigger a fracturing of society along generational lines like the more familiar fracturing of societies along racial, religious and ethnic lines. How will we respond to our children when they ask, “How could you do this to us? How could you leave us facing such chaos?”

From Lester Brown’s Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization.

Support + Share

Help us spread the word. Share it online with your friends or subscribe to the print edition.

Adbusters #82

All Comments

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
May
09, 2009
11:59 pm
Link
Infowars.net "The governments need to !" "The corporations need to ." There's a war on for control of humanity, and you're all debating the nuances of the two pronged strategy. Tyranny of corporate greed is only possible with the cooperation of legal force (government). Freedom from tyranny is possible if we want it, but only if we can refrain from enforcing our opinions on others. I know that's a tough one for some of you granola heads, but by stooping to intimidation and government coercion on behalf of your ideals only alienates your fellow man. We live in an arena of ideas, so brush up on your logic and put down the legislation. Have faith in your neighbor. Trust one another.
May
18, 2009
11:40 am
Link
A Letter to E.T. When I look into the night sky, I realize the importance of this…when I see the earth, I remember that it must be protected, when I encounter friends, family, and think about our lives, I sometimes like to think we are here for more important reasons, or at least, we need something to remind us that we’re here for more important reasons. To where does our destiny lie, this humanity? Is it a competition that follows some Darwinian logic? Or is it some Taoist like principle of balance between forces? We need only to look at the stars. We’ve had the incredible opportunity, and we’ve wasted it. I fear that the only way we see it is when the light of God will be the flash of nuclear Armageddon. The people of this remote little world are not protecting this special place in the cosmos. It’s probably already too late. I am writing this letter to you, E.T. so that if you may find it, you will know that there was a human who thought deeply about these existential dilemmas every single day of its seventy-five year life span. I hope that when you inherit what is left of this world, you might be able to salvage what is valuable most… At the present time, Earth is under assault by forces it hasn’t seen in many, many years. Not enough is being done to save the planet and humanity from itself. Humanity’s fate is directly tied into the planet integral; the human-Earth relationship has become strained over many generations, and a “feud” between these forces has erupted on a global scale. Humanity has managed to tarnish the world through its abusive power of technology that has led to massive amounts of pollution. Our numbers now range in the billions, straining a planet already under the natural processes of tectonic displacement and atmospheric change. Earth is evolving as she has since her birth, but me and my fellow humans’ inability to adapt along with these changes is making the situation ever more precarious. I know that if you find this, then humanity is gone. I know that if you’re out there, which I have the most sincere and absolute faith that you do, what with the size of our galaxy alone, at a hundred thousand light-years worth of stars, that you will inherit this world and make it yours. Treat her right. Earth will provide all that you need in the way of nourishment. She gives in vast abundance, is violent at times, but generally very pleasant and sexy. The star she orbits will offer eons of light to guide you through those seasons of want and woe. The planet’s moon will accompany you on those hard, sad nights when everything in life has been weighing you down, and shall give you an ethereal blue glow to illuminate the inner working landscape of your soul. I hope that this letter finds you well, my friend. May the Earth bless you and provide you with all the crops you desire. -Signed,
May
05, 2009
11:48 am
Link
"Now that your nation is infected with the diseases of pigs you can understand what you are" my favorate saying in comment history. may the western world fall at the feet of anarchy.
May
04, 2009
12:05 pm
Link
There are millions of square miles of uninhabited landmass on Earth. The human race will, as it has for over 500,000 years, adapt and move on.
May
08, 2009
02:44 am
Link
|Complacency equals adaptation equals Business As Usual?
May
06, 2009
01:31 pm
Link
1. Yep, and it is all in Antarctica XD 2. How many humans can this planet handle? Be serious!
May
04, 2009
03:45 pm
Link
You say 500,000 years like thats a long time?
May
05, 2009
10:11 am
Link
Whether it is or not, or whether you think it is or not, is irrelevant. Humans will continue to adapt to change and, as I said, we've got millions of square miles of land to move into and develop, thus negating the "overpopulation by a rise in sea level" argument.
May
05, 2009
02:50 pm
Link
Your profound statement reeked of ignorance, you said 500,000 years as if it is a long time which it clearly is not when you consider that the planet is 4.5 billion years old? Our existence is a mere speck on the historical time line, it could cease in an instant (relatively speaking). Lets not even get started on questioning whether the land you confidently speak of is (would still be) fertile, whether it will support and sustain the ever increasing world population, how it would be controlled/shared/governed. I'm sure as a race we will survive but not without great pain and loss of life... do we always have to do it the hard way? I'm happy that you have such overwhelming confidence in the human race though. Have a big life!
May
05, 2009
08:37 pm
Link
Nice strawman.
May
07, 2009
08:36 pm
Link
As not everyone knows what a strawman is, please elaborate and explain why you think it is a strawman fallacy; unless you don't know and in that case it's just ad hominem (which is merely an attack on the person who made the argument rather than an attempt to clarify the argument and is therefore completely dismissable).
May
05, 2009
09:19 pm
Link
A rat always knows when its in with weeeeaaaasels
May
05, 2009
11:47 pm
Link
Your cautious take on scientific claims is a good thing, I think. But as I recall, the claim was that it MAY BE irreversible. Let's celebrate the fact that it hasn't happened in the past 3 years, but there isn't too much cheer to pass around quite yet: take a look at "Extreme Ice" on NOVA. This is a grand experiment, and it smells like roulette par excellence. The stakes are quite high, you know. Ever stood on the edge of a curb and not fallen off onto the street? Would you step as quickly onto the edge of the Grand Canyon? I don't think your movements would be quite as carefree. The fact that Greenland ice melt hasn't been completed yet doesn't justify delaying action, because the moment it happens, it is too late to see whether it will happen or not. "Extreme Ice" provides plenty of reason for caution in another direction, I think.
May
03, 2009
10:12 am
Link
Human Civilization would eventually find itself struggling in the face of a global catastrophe if we kept on going like this.
May
03, 2009
10:11 am
Link
Human Civilization would eventually find itself struggling in the face of a global catastrophe if we kept on going like this.
May
01, 2009
11:56 pm
Link
Just one very short blurb........ .... the way I see it, the only problem is that there are to many people "They Shoot Horses don't they?"
May
08, 2009
03:39 am
Link
absolutely! Too many people for the moment now. Any soulutions or research into this?
May
08, 2009
08:54 pm
Link
Floating Ocean Cities: A global system of these structures can easily accommodate many millions of people and relieve the land based population pressures. They can provide the inhabitants with information and serve as natural sea aquariums without artificially enclosing marine life. http://www.thevenusproject.com/city_think/city_sea.htm
May
13, 2009
02:01 am
Link
Yes, mate. Thanks. I know of this and am happy because it exists. But is there any movement to stop or at least curtail the population growth before we are living in this great future?
May
01, 2009
07:42 pm
Link
I totally think global warming is an issue, but I hate how most of the people who say how they want to change it don't really DO anything. Of course, there ARE some exceptions, but not nearly enough. Comments? from the keyboard of Red Dynamite
May
01, 2009
07:21 am
Link
Sorry pal, but not talking about something you want to work out doesn't make it any clearer. I agree that some thinking can be done before talking, but the sharing of ideas is the best thing that humans have going for them. What you mean is that you are frustrated with lack of clarity/progress, not discussion itself.
May
01, 2009
07:19 am
Link
Sorry pal, but not talking about something you want to work out doesn't make it any clearer. I agree that some thinking can be done before talking, but the sharing of ideas is the best thing that humans have going for them. What you mean is that you are frustrated with lack of clarity/progress, not lack of discussion.
April
30, 2009
07:00 am
Link
The longer we all argue about how to fix or patch the 'current' system the more resources, time, energy and lives we'll waste. HAVE YOU HEARD ABOUT>>> THE VENUS PROJECT By Jacque Fresco. Mr Fresco is a 93 year Industrial designer/Inventor/Engineer as well as a fascinating social and philosophical thinker. He's an old intellectual sparing partner of EINSTEIN! http://www.youtube.com/user/jacquefresco Talking in reference to the Venus Project
April
30, 2009
06:58 am
Link
The values (or lack of) of the 'throw away' society are so ingrained in the world today that it's going to take a lot of work to shift our unsustainable and selfish habits of consumption. We learn from our mistakes, now that we have learnt we must act.
May
01, 2009
10:52 am
Link
Hi Etch, We HAVEN'T learned from our mistakes. Not REALLY. When masses of people have to relocate to inland areas and the cancer rate and storms increase, maybe we will stop buying processed packaged foods (poisoning our homes and bodies)? On a different level, when commercials/producers stop PORTRAYING that our society/cancer causing-packaged products are just fine and dandy and start sending out the very real facts of our dire state, maybe we will BEGIN to be aware of our mistakes? On yet another level, if the producers stop making such packaged processed foods/items will we be awakened? And pushing further to another level, maybe the government will order such companies to close altogether and then shall we be wide-eyed and aware? Why do we need most of the items/foods in grocery stores anyway? Yes, the purchase of these damaging items/foods (to our environment and bodies) IS ingrained. Why doesn't the FEAR AND REALITY of what's happening break that conditioning? Are we really that stupid and lazy and selfish? BREAK THE CONDITIONING. On a greater level, positive altering decisions/messages/executions from producers and the government in regards to damaging products (which determine general zombie wasteful mindsets) would help us but this won't happen because MONEY is more important to them than SURVIVAL OF THIS EARTH AND SOCIETY. I thought the government and big business represented strong intellect? Why is the WORK it will take to start bringing our own to-go containers/bags, eating differently, growing our own gardens or buying from farmer's markets, recycling, car-pooling or biking so threatening and avoided when all the "work" in the world becomes irrelevant when even the chance for us to change things with "work" isn't even a thought anymore because extinct human minds think NOT?
April
29, 2009
05:12 am
Link
Civilization is often used as a synonym for the broader term "culture" in both popular and academic circles. Every human being participates in a culture, defined as "the arts, customs, habits... beliefs, values, behavior and material habits that constitute a people's way of life". However, in its most widely used definition, civilization is a descriptive term for a relatively complex agricultural and urban culture. Civilizations can be distinguished from other cultures by their high level of social complexity and organization, and by their diverse economic and cultural activities. 
April
28, 2009
12:52 pm
Link
Although I agree, and yes New Zealand boosting its renewable electricity within a short period of time is great, these efforts are insignificant. Many say that we are in over our heads already. We've bitten off way more than our greedy self-centered civilization can chew. Global Warming is looked at by every person in either one of two ways. 1: We're doomed, its going to destroy the Earth and there's nothing we can do about it. 2: Its an event which we must focus our priorities on in order to prevent a catastrophic future. But I think that we're looking in the wrong direction. Carbon emissions are the leading cause of global warming? Ok yes it makes sense to eliminate them or at least decrease our emissions as we need them to do our day to day tasks. But why not research, I don't know, how to break apart carbon once it is in the atmosphere? How to re-introduce healthier oxygen into the atmosphere? I'm no scientist. These suggestions are probably not even possible. But the point is that people are not going to stop these day to day tasks that kill our planet. We need people who will think outside the box. People who will put effort and money into something that sounds ridiculous at present, but may be accepted in the future. For example, travel back to the 1700s and explain to someone that their earth will physically melt in a phenomenon labeled "global warming", I doubt they'll jump on the gun.
April
30, 2009
05:06 am
Link
Samcleod, Changing the ways of the world, or interrogating everyday practices (perhaps, even our diet) is not looking at the wrong direction. This is precisely the challenge that climate change poses - to look beyond our own convenience to examine and rethink how our perspectives and the accompanying lifestyles that they have engendered have planted the seeds of environmental destruction. While we should by all means develop technology to mitigate the effects of global warming, it is irresponsible to rely on these techno-fixes (such as the distasteful idea of carbon sequestration) to dispel the global warming catastrophe altogether, or even a significant portion of it. It is an escapist route because it implies that people, especially in the global north (and those in the global south who live according to the gospels of the global north), can continue their plunder of the earth that their excessive and wasteful lifestyles require. Our scientific genius cannot always save us, and even if it can, we should not always look to it as our salvation because it severely cripples our humanity, our moral responsibility, as in our judgment to make sacrifices to solve a plague that we ourselves engendered. What we need right now is a healthy balance of science and technology and a commitment to radically changing our lifestyles, to giving up the easy, fast food, to-go, disposable lifestyle.
April
30, 2009
12:15 pm
Link
I agree. I never once denied this. However I will rephrase one of my sentences to be more relevant to the point I was trying to get across. I said "I think we're looking at the the wrong way," but I think that was a bit of a jump. Let's say: "I think that we're being to focused on one general solution".
April
29, 2009
03:34 am
Link
I see, you think cutting back carbon emmisions is insignificant because you believe someone like you just needs to point out that we could magically fix everything - without becoming less greedy and self-centered. Come now Sam, you must be retarded if you think there isn't a huge pool of resources going into researching ways to reverse the effects of climate change. The fact is there is no simple answer and people like you who cling to outmoded ideas of 'science-ing' away this problem are going to face immediate physical danger if you don't figure that out pronto. Kapeech?

We are a global network of culture jammers and creatives working to change the way information flows, the way corporations wield power, and the way meaning is produced in our society.

Now 83,841 strong!

Join Us >>

TOOLS FOR ACTIVISTS

What's This?

RECENT ADBUSTERS MAGAZINES

Logo Small