Commentary

Too Big To Fail?

If global capitalism is to die, it will be a death of a million stings.

Too Big To Fail?

Photo: Newscom

It was the final day of actions against the G8, and we were marching on a small, winding road through the hills of Hokkaido. At least two rows of police lined both sides of the march, their dark uniforms and long batons cutting strange forms against the misty landscape.

But I tried not to notice them, directing my gaze instead at the distant hills bleeding into the sky, the places where the clouds parted, allowing the sunlight to burst through. The air was thick, sweat and pollen stuck to my body.

I, along with many others, had come across the world to protest the G8. Now that we were here, it was difficult to decipher exactly what that body of power actually was. It was the posh hotel sitting in the distant hills, far away from the reach of any protesters. It was the subtle touch of the Japanese cop's hand on my shoulder, letting me know that whatever strength I might think I have, he has more. It was the culture of fear at the protest camps, backed up by the very real threat of government repression, causing people to hide their faces from each other and shun all cameras. It was the constant bombardment by advertisements and products, the neon lights and flashing billboards in this, Japan, the Asian darling of neo-liberalism.

The thing about the G8 protests is that they come up against a staggeringly broad system of power. They are not directed at a single institution, country, or act, but rather, at the informal system of global decision-making predicated on the rule of brute power, cynical self-interest, and anti-democratic decision-making. We were not just protesting the fact that the world's most rich, powerful nations get together and make decisions that affect the world, without inviting the world to take part in a meaningful way. We were also protesting the decisions that these governments make, in all capacities, alone and together, to wage unjust wars, spew carbon into the atmosphere, impose neo-liberal trade policies, spread new forms of global capitalism. It was a protest against an international framework, buttressed by incredible power, symbolized and manifested by the G8 meetings.

We moved through the thick heat, a colorful mass of people. I kept my eyes on the rolling earth, wondering if every horizon I was to see in Japan would be littered with riot police. Throughout the protests, government repression was always near. The fear of arrest – Japan's staggering twenty-three days of detention and high rate of conviction – had caused us to internalize police power, regulating and limiting our own actions. This was the arm of the G8 – the force it relies on to stifle dissent and maintain power. The cops were the most obvious enemy – but of course, the systems of power propping up the G8 are much more diffuse, webbing through society, sometimes constituting society. In lieu of a single locus of power, we push against the police. They are the bodies that directly block us and obstruct our view.

Standing in front of the lake, we could barely make out the island in the distance where the meetings were being held. It was green and faint, the water perfectly still. We stood beating our drums and holding our signs: "People Power, No G8" and "Japan = Police State, Fuck 23 day detention." Out of range of the meetings, we scrummed with the police.

At the anti-G8 forum leading up to the actions, I heard the word "revolution" used a few times. But I also heard other words take its place: cracks, dismantling, deconstruction. John Holloway, a movement intellectual, gave a talk where he argued that our generation of global justice activists is akin to bees swarming, and if global capitalism is to die, it will be a death of a million stings.

There seem to be many things at the heart of this shifting language: A loss of faith in the old left construction of revolution as a single, pivotal moment that wipes the slate clean, taking us back to time zero. A belief that there is no outside or other to power, but that power creates us as well, generating its own truths, planting itself deep inside those seeking to resist it. The notion that there are no single root causes or structures to attack, but rather a collection of historical singularities, diffuse yet interconnected, dispersed like a web. The idea that alternative forms of power must be built meticulously and carefully, rooted in horizontalism, refusing to play the game of frantic power grabbing.

Is this right? I do not know. The world appears in strange fragments. Different texts and historical narratives struggle with each other on paper. Meetings last long into the night. Government and police infiltrators spy on our gatherings, corrupt our movements, create fear and paranoia. Capitalists destroy our neighborhoods, forests, communities, lives. Endless webs of NGOs make incremental improvements, compromising so much, appropriating social movements. Beams of hope flash out, in urban centers, rural spaces, workplaces, acts of awesome courage and resistance.

I thought about the night before, how we stayed up late into the night arguing in a room that was too small, trying to navigate through multiple languages, different conceptions of direct action, international misunderstandings and offenses, to establish some kind of cohesive plan. And now, after a night of conflict, we acted together, linked arms against the police lines, created one cohesive mass in the Hokkaido hills.

Are we the cracks? The bees? If so, the cracks themselves are highly contested spaces. There is no obvious outside of the system, no clear breaking point. In radical spaces, in meetings that last long into the night, we argue over what the next day's action will be, we struggle to establish horizontal power, we fight for the soul of our movement.

I tried to keep my eyes on the rolling beauty around me. Birds cawed overhead, the clouds moved slowly. The ocean was somewhere nearby, I could faintly smell its salt breath.

At times, it may feel that we are up against a totalizing force, everywhere at once, diffuse and multiple. But then, the specificity of place interrupts, brings a heartbreaking beauty. And we see ourselves moving within that, at a clear point in space, a distinct group of people, surprisingly unified, dashing our hopes to the misty fog, green hills. And there is a strange sort of rightness that emerges, as we struggle to keep our gaze extended beyond the riot cops, as we start to push up against something else, something more important. And the horror begins to chip away. We are trying.

Support + Share

Help us spread the word. Share it online with your friends or subscribe to the print edition.

Adbusters #80

All Comments

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
October
03, 2008
04:34 pm
Link

I like titties.

October
03, 2008
02:02 pm
Link

Anybody ever thought about joining or starting a union where they live and work, rather than a once-a-year mob on the other side of the world? Capital / Labor. Fight them where and when their (our) wealth is created: the point of production (or services rendered). It's not that new, folks.

October
02, 2008
01:01 pm
Link

I can't imagine a Russia-China style of governance would be any better than an American one...we must be careful not to romanticize politics.

October
02, 2008
08:30 pm
Link

No one here knows a fucking thing about what is going to happen. Your all to cowardly to journey deep enough down the spiral but thats okay it just kind of keeps going... Its nature is so apparent and obvious, but without strong people to show others its nature, we will all suffer in droves for years to come like a murder of wingless crows.

September
25, 2008
11:39 pm
Link

Start reading the FUCKING ARTICLES...:) it will help your better understanding of the real world...:)

September
25, 2008
11:36 pm
Link

...I stare with a glint of horror, but indeed a mischievous smile to armistice your eager intriguing's. We shall start a Revolution. A revolution in Justice and in manner that will put an end to all of it! Their need be a group willing and able. To dismantle across the Earth and start the fire from under the belly. The True Revolution can not start in just one heart.

September
22, 2008
03:17 am
Link

I don't think that capitalism is about to fail. And China, like Mark wrote in his commnent, is not a new thing... it's just a capitalist authoritarian state. What's nothing really new... and you're right, the unipolar world maybe comes to an end, but capitalism? No. States and societies propably will more and more become authoritarian. That's all.

September
19, 2008
01:41 pm
Link

Interesting article. It's quite ironic (and somewhat scary) that those "international" institutions that many have condemned (i.e. Wallstreet banks, IMF, World Bank, etc.) have declined incredibly.

The credit crunch is the tip of the iceberg. Most people must come to the realization that the collapse of Globalism has already begun. The decline of the Western-based ideals of "Globalism" is inevitable as the sunrise.

Say good-bye to the US-version of a capitalistic, international minded Uni-polar world, and say hello to the Chinese-Russian version of a nationalistic minded Multi-polar world, based on mutual co-operation, not overt military power by one country.

This is real. The Uni-polar world most of us grew up in is defeated. The problems that the BRIC (Brazil Russia India China) nations and the non-Western world faces is quite simple:

How do you dispose of a dieing dog ?

The dog in this case is USA.

The challenge for China/Russia the BRIC nations and the rest of the non-Western world (and to a certain degree the EU) is quite simple; they need to figure out a way to integrate USA into the emerging world order, a world order based on multi-polarism not uni-polarism.

It is essentially and literally impossible to believe America's past manouvres will be acceptable as the world moves forward. Military aggression and other forms of abuse of international law will not help America's cause.

The world is trying to figure out how to bring America down gently, without letting USA bark too loudly. The dog (USA) is deing and soon the dog will be dead (figurativelyu speaking). America's political, financial and economic position in the world is and has been deteriorating for somet time now.

The only question is how can the emerging world powers incorporate America into the order without too much problems?

History speaks clear of the fact that Empires do not go down easily, however with the types of nuclear weaponry available to nations in the world today, we must hope and pray that this is one empire that will quietly sit down instead of biting everyone.

September
23, 2008
05:16 am
Link

An interesting response Mark, but also ironically optimistic. You're heroicizing communism and failing to see that in both Russian and China, communism has been a failure. Communism, just as democracy, lends itself to authoritarianism as we all know. Any form of government does. We had corrupt governments in Russian and China there in the 70s, and we have corrupt governments there now.
*
What we'll have if the American "empire" falls is merely a vacuum that some other nation will fill. Furthermore, we have to take into account that the governments of nations _obviously_ aligned with the US government, like Japan or Germany or England, are spending millions just to prop up the economy.
*
This is also true in nations which most don't perceive as being on the US's side--as of July 08 China owns over 518 billion (USD) in American bonds; China is one of the many countries that is propping the US economy up at the moment, second only to Japan in fact (593 billion). You know who the fourth largest country is? Brazil. Yeah. Brazil with 148bil. Russia, too, figures into this prominently, at number 6.
*
I fail to see how the "BRIC" nations are any different, or better, than the United States. This is our future, and I want to change it as much as anyone else. I simply don't want to see petty arguments about nationalism enter into the equation. A shitty, corrupt, capitalist government is still a shitty, corrupt, capitalist government by any other name.
*
From Chicago,
Mike Joyce

September
29, 2008
09:09 am
Link

I agree with all your arguments, mike. just one problem: china and the USSR were NEVER communist nations. i dare say they weren't even socialist. they called themselves that, they even made one or other internal reform that might resemble communism, but they never got close. at least not to what Marx meant by communism...any one that studies marxism knows that.

September
19, 2008
09:29 am
Link

The problem is governments, even democratic systems, around the world are still controlled by rich, mostly male, mostly older people who have gone to the "right" schools and know the "right" people who are usually the worst a society has to offer. If we can somehow find a way to keep these types of people from getting into places of power, we can make positive change.

September
18, 2008
09:29 pm
Link

ADBUSTERS IS BACK!

September
23, 2008
08:53 pm
Link

haha awesome comment.

September
18, 2008
05:58 pm
Link

Power, in the liberal-conservative context, means being able to force other people to do as you say. Those who seek power are always the most psychotic and sociopathic members of any society, because they cannot accept other people as their equals. Everything must be heirarchical, with one's place defined by those above and those below...

But that's not power. Power is energy, the ability to keep yourself warm at night, the ability to grow food using the power of sunlight, something very different from the liberal-conservative viewpoint.

The G8, however, understand very well that their position of power (over others) is predicated on their control of global resources: fossil fuels, agricultural land, minerals, manufacturing, weapons production, and so on. By controlling those elements, they control other people (often using the weapons, when more subtle methods fail).

To escape the control of the G8, you need to have control of real power - energy. If you have solar panels and wind turbines and own a piece of land with reliable water supplies, then you can indeed disconnect yourself from the system of global power (over people).

It's hard to go it alone, but what if the entire community that you live in goes the same way? What if you suddenly realize you don't need to be tied down to the consumer treadmill in order to survive and be happy?

In such a world, trade would revolve around manufactured goods, not around energy, food, water and raw materials. Trade would also be by choice among equals, not dictated by anti-democratic institutions like the WTO, the World Bank, and the IMF (or by Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Buffet & Gates, etc.)

September
23, 2008
09:09 pm
Link

Yea Utopia here we come!

Seriously, I know so many people who want to just buy a piece of land and be self-sufficient with YERTs or earthships and community living etc.
Friends are always talking of starting communities out in the middle of nowhere. I haven't seen anyone's plans come to fruition yet because we are all financially immature (mid-twenties students and 'hipsters' mostly) and are unable to even consider buying land, let alone paying off our student loans.
If there is any sort of new counter-culture forming to replace our apathetic consumerdom, I really hope it's a back-to-the-land sort of grassroots movement, even if we all have to be much older by the time we're able to make it happen. The path from where we are now to where we want to be has clear steps: 1)educate yourself, 2)act on your convictions 3)create a new reality.

Idealistic? Yes. Impossible? Pshaw, no. The most important thing to remember is that our actions speak louder than words. Let's put our money where our mouths are.

September
24, 2008
01:06 am
Link

If you're interested in being closer to the land and more independant living, I recommend looking into the World Wide Organization of Organic Farms.
It's a good (cheap) place to start and gain experience.

http://www.wwoof.org

playing: "Love Over Gold"-Dire Straits

We are a global network of culture jammers and creatives working to change the way information flows, the way corporations wield power, and the way meaning is produced in our society.

Now 83,841 strong!

Join Us >>

TOOLS FOR ACTIVISTS

What's This?

RECENT ADBUSTERS MAGAZINES

Logo Small