Many of the new ideas about sustainability and resilience are nothing more than a recognition that the old ways of living are actually good, as seen today in small villages throughout Europe, Mexico, Latin America, Asia and Africa.
In our Western culture of over-consumerism, we have actually missed the opportunity of reaching any kind of sustainability. Perhaps we never have actually understood what that concept is all about. I always thought that the original sustainable development term – which was coined 20 years ago in the 1987 UN report, Our Common Future – was a total oxymoron.
Perhaps the main reason that we never got it, is that such a level of true understanding of what is at stake requires being proactive. We need to think about the implications of our lifestyle, think about consequences. Yikes, that is too much work, so why bother? It is easier just to keep on BAUing (Business As Usual) and pretend everything is fine.
As a consequence of our inaction, we are starting to see the concept of resilience replacing sustainability as a goal.
Perhaps this is because we are finally realizing that the imminent threats of global warming, climate change, overpopulation, poverty, religious wars, peak oil, food scarcity, etc. are real. So we are now talking about the need to become resilient, to be ready to cope with all the social, economic and environmental changes and challenges that are coming.
Suddenly, a sense of urgency is in the air, and there is talk about local resilience and resilient communities. If we don’t understand these concepts, and make changes necessary for a significantly different way of life, sooner or later we will be forced into facing the next level down: becoming survival communities of sorts.
The diagram tries to graph this idea. We have already missed the sustainability plateau and we are starting the descent. Maybe we can stop the fall at the resiliency plateau. If we can’t, we will then face really difficult times.
Originally published in The Watershed Sentinel, June-July 2008











































14, 2008
09:28 pm
Link
Professionally, I've moved in ten years from building windfarms and macroscale green infrastructure, through corporate CSR change amd sustainability to diconnecting, deteching and resilience training. I've advised Prime Ministers, Executive leaders, State and Municipalities - most get it but nearly all lack the moral, rational thinking and courage required to change.
I look to the military think tanks, academia, big oil like BP and Japanese companies for leadership on scenario planning and strategic foresight (while avoiding survivalist militias and ghetto thinking!).
Personal change and enhancement(spiritual,physical mental,emotional)coupled with networked support groups provides some buffer. We also have to evangelise change across all society in a way that is positive. We still need an element of economic resilience though!
— GeesBees14, 2008
01:14 am
Link
We should utilize hemp fiber for fuel, building materials, clothing, paper, health, textiles and food to alleviate some of our problems. We know humans have used hemp products as far back as 8000BC. People have known for millenia that the benefits of hemp are numerous and far-reaching. North America has vast areas of land where hemp will grow abundantly. Simultaneously we should stop converting food crops into biofuel since hemp will provide an alternate source of fuel saving our crops for eating. Cars should then be produced that run on hemp-derived fuel, and made with hemp-derived products, then we can stop being as dependent on foreign oil. Many new industries based on hemp could create many thousands of jobs around the country. Millions of acres of hemp will absorb CO2 and release O2 making it a cleaner cycle of production and consumption. The applications for hemp in textile industries are vast, as well. Hemp was banned in America in 1937, then again in 1955 after it was produced to help win WWII. We need it yet again to help win this current struggle.
— Josh13, 2008
08:40 pm
Link
I feel kind of privellaged to be a part of such an interesting time for the world. It would be kind of cool to be the last humans to walk the earth, if you think about it, it would be something a little different - the planets last generation.
Over consumption - I blame it on professional sports...
— vibes12, 2008
11:51 am
Link
If you look closely at the post 2008, downward plunge part of the graph, you will notice that the line occasionally decreases along the x-axis. That would seem to indicate that the "Growth" is able to go BACK IN TIME! Now THAT is cool! How does that work, exactly? During humanity's downward spiral to Survivor Island do we somehow manage to build time machines? And then do we put "Growth" in it to send back to ourselves a few months ago? Or did you just draw it when you were drunk?
I'd been debating deleting adbusters from my rss feed, and I think you just made up my mind.
— Anonymous10, 2008
08:04 pm
Link
that's what this site is about, stirring emotions out of readers by forcing a different perspective (not necessarily the right perspective) but going through that process is what I enjoy... if you want tips on being more sustainable go worldchanging or treehugger go to www.sustainableday.com
— stiven10, 2008
03:09 pm
Link
this is why left wing idea's are not taken seriously in the mainstream, and it angers me that there isnt more quality control on some of the writters in this mag... the cockiness and ignorence is sickening... what, u make up a graph with no reserch to back it up then have the nerve to refere to that graph as the background for your debate... the writter sounds like a born again christian who keeps refering to the bible for evidance of christ...
— Anonymous09, 2008
01:07 pm
Link
everyone knows everything already just wiki it! uhh i know all
— Anonymous08, 2008
08:04 pm
Link
This magazine is a joke. I used to think it had some insightful commentary on modern culture, but its starting to sound more like the rants of an ill educated sophomore studying philosophy. This essay provides no evidence to support its argument. We are just expected to accept that our society is no longer sustainable, because the author says so. And we are expected to take accept as evidence a back-of-the-envelope diagram of what will happen next.
I can tell that a lot of work and thought went into that diagram, let examine what it tells us. The Y-axis is labeled growth (not level of development), and from this we infer that growth increases as time (the x-axis) goes on. The author describes a nation as developed or developing based on its growth; that is, a developing nation is growing slower. This is completely false, as evidenced by the double-digit growth of China and India in recent years, while the developed would has been happy with 3%. And when this crash occurs, notice that growth is still positive; we are to illogically infer that since we reached earth's capacity, we will have to grow slower. It's too bad the author didn't spend more time thinking about what he was drawing, rather than just focusing on how he could draw a drop off.
The author would also have us believe that we have exceeded earth's carrying capacity, but gives us no evidence of what earth's carrying capacity is; we can infer from the diagram that it was sometime in the 1980s. But these Malthusian arguments have never held, because they fail to consider that people adapt. Yes, if we were all hunter-gatherers 6 billion people would not fit. But we have made tremendous strides in the ability to feed the world, and will continue to.
I've got an open mind, but I have little tolerance for those who make wide sweeping criticisms without backing up (or thinking through) their arguments.
— Anonymous08, 2008
11:35 pm
Link
Would you feel intimidated If I ask you to comment on my blog?
http://buddhaofhollywood.blogspot.com/
BoH
— buddha08, 2008
09:18 am
Link
Also tell us the truth about the neo cortex and the ingestion by early homo sapiens of psychedelic mushrooms containing psilocybin. People have the right to know of their true natures.
Why does adbusters conspire to keep the nature of esoteric anatomy away from alternative mindsets? I thought it was the journal of the mental environment, tell us about the nature of DMT and near death out of body visionary experiences, why are the mechanics of such experiences not discussed.
Adbusters conceals the truth about DMT for fear of being labeled something other than anarcho-shiek, oh know people will think we are hippy new agers when really we are dreary end agers with bleak portraits of the future in our minds eyes.
DMT TRUTHOUT NOW
— The people09, 2008
05:46 am
Link
what conspiracy, everyone knows what that shit does, go to wiki
— Anonymous08, 2008
09:06 am
Link
How could anyone who does not belong to the Illuminati say that HUMANS are the reason for the global economic meltdown? That is called "death worship", mental imagery of bodies stacked in heaps from SARS, Anthrax, Nuclear Weapons, unrestricted warfare and starvation come to mind. The individual that claims "humans are the problem" is forgetting that they are not protected from sarin gas or the effects of starvation and malnutrition which could be applied to "fix the problem".
We are talking about PEOPLE, not little bugs or horny rabbits, but human beings. De-population belongs under the category of extreme and radical evil, even if your intentions are to "balance out the planet", it still isnt a good enough reason to murder. Balancing out the planet could include shooting yourself in the face, so why dont you start there?
Why doesnt every family grow a garden? Why cant every home be self-sufficient? Why shouldnt we abandon obsessive dictatorial concepts of control over humankind and abandon threats and violence towards the poor with whom we all identify?
My solution involves the banks, which sell money to our countries, they must be disassembled. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy must merge so that the maximum amount of income anyone can collect will be $1,000,000.00, any spill-over profit must be apportioned until everyone is earning that capitol, then that max earning can be raised. The profit incentive must be erased, not people.
— The People08, 2008
03:43 pm
Link
How about getting rid of interest and creating money that expires after a short amount of time.
— AnonymousThat way there is no accumulation of wealth. The money would have to be spent, keeping the economy healthy and doing away with bank monopoly.
However thinking up of a better system can easily be done. More difficult is evolving as a human race and that is for each and everyone of us to do.
15, 2008
11:26 am
Link
Excellent idea - but needs expansion. Hope you write a larger article on the topic with all the ups and downs. Well done!
— Anonymous09, 2008
09:03 am
Link
genius!
— Anonymousmoney with an expiry date!
live for the now...
08, 2008
02:11 pm
Link
Who's to say that humans are more important than other organisms? Is it because we have conscious thought? Because we are smarter than speices? I don't believe my life is worth more than a mouse's. Mine may be more intellectual, but it is also more destructive. I'm not saying that I support mass slaughter of humankind, I am saying, however, that I also don't support the slaughter and extinction of other organisms who are in their own right innocent and, in my opinion, have more of a right to live on this planet than we do.
As a scientific term, community is all species of animals and plants living in a given area and how they interact with each other. The human idea of community is a neighborhood of houses and families all of one speices.
Ecosystems are fundemental to all life and should be treated with as much care as we would give our own families.
— Sionnian13, 2008
10:57 am
Link
"I don't believe my life is worth more than a mouse's."
"...in my opinion, have more of a right to live on this planet than we do."
These statements contradict one-another. If your life isn't worth more than a mouse's, than it would also be true to say that the mouse's life isn't worth more than yours. Ergo, you have just as much right to live on this planet as the mouse does. I see your intent, but your lack of clarity is a lack of full-truth.
"The human idea of community is a neighborhood of houses and families all of one species."
But it isn't. I feel, that humans already view each other in such an unrelatable way that we may as well be different species. I for one can say that when I run into my neighbors I don't think, "Ah, my fellow countryman, my brother-in-Liberty." I think, "Get the hell out of the way, freak!" But maybe it's just because I have a freak living next-door.
— Strachan08, 2008
08:25 am
Link
this is all bullshit,the earth is sustainable,its the people which are the problem
— Unkn0wn08, 2008
05:53 am
Link
Sustainability and resilience are the same thing at the level of continued survival, anything else and one is just staying the inevitable for the short term. This article is mostly empty and of a daft intellectual sort notably disconnected from any functional nuances...
This sense of urgency is fear its a natural response to what happening here, but it would be better if adbusters took the iniative to provide a neo-spiritual framework or at least some articles referencing the works of people who have thought in these regards; as opposed to delivering the same fearmongering we get in mainstream media.
Adbusters must use its 96% recyclable product and publish usefull information ie. how to grow ones own foods in urban settings...I could go on but really what needs to happen is adbusters has to address the functional aspects of how we are going to survive and not just give intellectual critique to a non-relevant media...Im thinking something along the lines of the "We're back" issue from 04.
Only inject some fucking spirit into what you do or it will only be the shallow reflection of the mass apathy and nihilism you so claim to oppose. People need to know about the true nature of our species and its past, about the symbiotic nature of our minds and the plants and fungis that produced the alkaloids allowing our spokesmonkey state of being to arise in the first place.
Our brains interact with the geomagnetic field of the earth via the bioelectromagnetic substance magnetite inside of the pineal gland in the center of our brains. We use it to regulate sleep/wake schedule and to generate dream potentialities.
The esoteric energy matrixes of all being coalescing in a moment of pure bliss awareness. These are the states given to us via our relation to the earth and its many manifest living forms, its is our duty as humans to know this connection at its deepest of levels and further its inception into our day to day modes of awareness such that it permeate the emptiness and fills the void that false material philosophies have created.
So if we don't here from the radical spiritualists in your magazine your not really relevant anymore, this isn't 2002 everyone is aware of what is occuring people choose ignorance and apathy or they come out of delusion and undertake the process of self-humanization.
So in closing, write a fucking article about DMT and how things are outside the cycle of fear.
— Smoking mirror12, 2008
11:53 am
Link
write it yourself, if you can put down the bong for long enough.
— Anonymous