#87 JAN/FEB 2010
The Big Ideas of 2010
#86 NOV/DEC 2009
The Virtual World / The Natural World
#85 Sep/Oct 2009
Thought Control in Economics
#84 July/August 2009
Nihilism and Revolution
#83 MAY/JUNE 2009
A New Aesthetic
#82 MARCH/APRIL 2009
Endgame Strategies
#81 JAN/FEB 2009
The Big Ideas of 2009
#80 NOV/DEC 2008
The Freedom From Want
#79 SEP/OCT 2008
East and West
#78 JULY/AUG 2008
Media Democracy
#77 MAY/JUNE 2008
The Global Moment
#76 MARCH/APRIL 2008
The Reconquest of Cool
#75 JAN/FEB 2008
The Big Ideas of 2008
#74 NOV/DEC 2007
The Quick & Dirty
#73 SEP/OCT 2007
Carbon Neutral Culture
#72 JUNE/JULY 2007
The Fake Issue
#71 MAY/JUNE 2007
Sorrow
#70 MAR/APR 2007
Blueprint for a New Left
#69 JAN/FEB 2007
Big Ideas of 2007
#68 NOV/DEC 2007
Apocalypse Soon
#67 SEPT/OCT 2006
Culture of Life/Culture of Death
#66 JUL/AUG 2006
Who Owns Terror
#65 MAY/JUNE 2006
Torture
#64 MAR/APR 2006
Spiritual Pollution
#63 JAN/FEB 2006
Big Ideas of 2006
#62 NOV/DEC 2005
Crack in the Facade
#61 SEPT/OCT 2005
Art Fart
#60 JULY/AUG 2005
Media Lit
#59 MAY/JUN 2005
Fist (Recto Verso)
#58 MAR/APR 2005
Bar Code
#57 JAN/FEB 2005
Big Ideas of 2005
#56 NOV/DEC 04
We're Back
#55 SEP/OCT 2004
No Future
#54 JULY/AUG 2004
I, Terrorist
#53 MAY/JUNE 2004
Hope and Memory
#52 MAR/APR 2004
Slap in the Face
#51 JAN/FEB 04
Systematically Distorted
#50 NOV/DEC 03
You Win You Lose





20, 2009
10:11 pm
Link
Anybody who fails to see the double standard at work here is either stupid, delusional or so partisan as to be unapproachable. Whether you like how Israel was carved out of other people's lands or not, the fact remains that as long as the Israelis possess nuclear weaponry, others in the region will want to do so as well.
Please don't tell me that the Israelis are better equipped to handle the doomsday weapons because Israel is a democracy. The biggest democracy in the world is thus far the only nation to have actually used nuclear weapons, so we know that the form of government means little or nothing.
The 800-pound gorilla in the room, naked as can be, is the Israeli nuclear stockpile. The hypocrisy of the West in supporting nukes in Israel while condemning nukes in other nations in the region is astounding, insupportable and the Iranians are laughing, as are the North Koreans.
— hartman_john22, 2009
11:00 am
Link
Useful Idiot.
— Anonymous11, 2009
04:32 am
Link
Iran over its nuclear program, Israel continues to maintain a not-so-secret nuclear.
Study abroad and learn English with students from over 30 different countries at a fully accredited and internationally recognised English language school. Sydney English Language Centre (SELC) is a school specialising in English language training with highly qualified and professional teachers. Course english australia.
— courseenglish11, 2009
02:34 am
Link
When the lunatics who invented israel by ethnically cleansing Palestine are tried in the Hague and the colonial experiment of zionism is thoroughly expunged from this world then we can reasonably expect Iran not to have Nukes. But obviously as long as racist jews in Israel and the U.S have their sweaty fingers on the trigger countries like Iran need them as well to keep the lunatics at bay.
— un242We can't have these nut jobs Slavic Europeans strutting around terrorizing the world and continuing to illegally occupy the country of Palestine.
israel is dying anyway. Best to just let it completely sputter out and let world peace spring forth again.
80 percent of Europeans polled cited israel as the biggest stumbling block to world peace.
The world will breathe a collective sigh of relief when the last holdover from old world colonialism is finally put to rest.
14, 2009
12:49 pm
Link
Please site your statistic "80 percent of Europeans polled cited israel as the biggest stumbling block to world peace."
— anonymous09, 2009
02:48 pm
Link
I am trying to find out the international penalty for the unilateral deployment of a nuclear warhead. Any suggestions as to where I should look?
— WisconsinNorm05, 2009
07:28 pm
Link
While I understand the "surgeon and plumber" analogy one person made, I am still perplexed. If the goal of nuclear proliferation is to rid the world of Nukes, why is Israel allowed to stockpile. How can you tell one country not to have nukes when their rival is allowed to build away??? It only gives them a political excuse, and a motive, to seek out nuclear capability. If Israel wants U.S. support then they should stop building nukes as well. If Iran ever nuked Israel, we'd nuke them in about 2 minutes. So Israel having nukes really doesn't do much. The only advantage I can see is that it gives us (the U.S.) a closer nuclear launch point from which to hit economic rivals like China, Russia, or even the E.U. if need be, giving us a tactical advantage over the other western nations.
Also, did I really see in the video that Israel has a "patented" laser system for enriching Uranium? I wonder what agency makes sure countries to infringe on other countries nuclear arsenal patents.....
— Anonymous01, 2009
10:18 am
Link
Hear hear! This is completely a double standard. Whilst on the topic I have some MORE double standards to point out!!!
Police men! yeah police men dammit! Those guys get to walk around public with guns! Criminals should be allowed to as well!
Surgeons! yeah surgeons dammit! Those guys get to cut people open.....no fair! Plumbers and construction workers should get to do that too!!
See where I'm going with this.....you cannot equate the two it is lunacy.
— Anonymous01, 2009
02:42 pm
Link
Please can you explain why, in your opinion, countries supported by the US/ UN are comparable to police and surgeons, whilst countries such as Iran are likened to plumbers and construction workers?
— Anonymous15, 2009
01:31 am
Link
I'm not the original guy with the surgeon/plumber analogy, but I think I have a pretty good explanation.
The police/criminals part makes more sense than the surgeons/plumbers + construction workers. The latter implies that they're not qualified to have nukes because they don't know how to use them (which is not true). The former implies that they are much more likely to use them for evil rather than in defense against evil (which is probably true).
Israel is a democracy (one that abuses human rights in many ways, but still a type of democracy). Iran is a theocratic dictatorship. There are people in Israel who advocate the extermination of the Palestinians (and other non-Israelis) so that the area might be 100% Israeli, but they are a shunned minority. There are people in Iran who advocate the extermination of Israelis and "the West" (especially the Americans and the British), and these people are in charge of the government. Their government is controlled by a sect of Islam that gleefully looks forward to the apocalypse. Most disturbingly, they regularly support terrorist groups. There is little danger in itself in Iran having nukes, as they would be quite unwilling to use them except as a bargaining chip in bullying their neighbors and international negotiations. The real danger is that they would then supply these nukes to people who do not fear using them (Hezbollah being the most likely candidate, who, like the current Iranian regime, have the stated mission of the destruction of Israel but who, unlike the current Iranian regime, have publicly shown themselves to be willing to fight and die for that cause).
When an everyday nut-job makes apocalyptic threats, people don't need to pay much attention. When presidents and ayatollahs who control a country with nuclear weapons make public apocalyptic threats, people tend to think they're serious. As Israel is not under the control of apocalyptic crazies (not yet, at least), I feel a bit more comfortable than if Iran had the bomb.
So, perhaps there is no moral difference between Israel and Iran having nuclear weapons. I'm not conceding that point, just saying that I'm not currently arguing it. But there is a huge practical difference. If you can't see that, well, I don't know what to say to you.
— BallsMcGrady12, 2009
09:36 am
Link
Wel...because Israel is not trying to blow the US off the map, whereas Iran may very well do that...and whether you hate or love us, the fact is that without the US, the world would be a much less interesting place...if nothing else, we're a hell of a lot more fun than the Taliban! At least we like to dance and listen to music.
— Anonymous05, 2009
08:21 pm
Link
Yeah...what an insult to plumbers and construction workers!!
— Anonymous01, 2009
03:54 pm
Link
When a swat team yells to a lunatic with a gun "put the gun down", they don't then put their guns down as well. To equate the two countries and apply the same standards to both is ludicrous. Would you have the U.S. get rid of all its nukes because Iran is agreeing to? No. One nuke in the hands of a psychopath like Ahmadinejad is more dangerous than a thousand in the hands of the U.S. or Israel. I'm not comparing Israelies to surgeons and Iranians to plumbers, I am illustrating the point that what is good practice for one party is not always good practice for every other. In this case that is definitely true. You can argue whether or no Iran is producing nuclear technology, fine, but you cannot argue that it would not be dangerous for them to have one given the statments of there bleeding leader!
— anonymuus02, 2009
02:04 pm
Link
I think it is important to remember that people against equating Israel with Iran like this dont necessarily think Iranian people or muslims are bad. They think, and with good reason, that Ahmedinjad is a lunatic. This sentiment is supported whole heartedly by the western world, and a good portion of Iranian voters (a majority if in fact the election was stolen). It is hard to argue that it would be a beneficial thing for such an extreme leader to get his hands on nukes.
— Chez05, 2009
05:48 pm
Link
Ahmedinjad doesn't have power.
Ahmedinjad couldn't launch a nuke if Iran even had one. His whims are simply not law.
Whatever inflammatory remarks he made (and the translation is disputed) shouldn't have an effect on Israel's nuclear policy. Israel's policy towards Palestinians is more dangerous than anything else. That's a much larger debate.
— Anonymous07, 2009
06:07 am
Link
Why is it more dangerous for Iran to have nuces than the US?
— red squirrelYou're forgetting that they actually used the weapons once in Japan.
Any country in possession of these weapons are prepared to use them at one point. Doesn't matter if the country is Iran or USA.
The US have no say in this matter and should stay out of it.
30, 2009
05:33 am
Link
I find it funny that people of this world has such a hard time living amongst different cultures.....
Why must we all the time 'claim land ours'? - It is here for all.
Why must we always fight by using religion? - Religion is a personal view on life and should not be forced onto others.
And I find it strange that the US and UN has decided to play world police, and does not let any other country than their own have nuclear weapons.
Nuclear weapons should be banned for all.
Maybe it is our destiny - to destroy this planet and everybody on it.
— red squirrelThis is the direction in which we are going at the moment, and this will not stop until every man admits that he was wrong and noone was right.
06, 2009
01:57 am
Link
sorry, i'm not actually keeping the main subject of the discussion in mind...
"I find it strange that the US and UN has decided to play world police"- I agree dude, US is owing the UN a shit load of cash, not to mention the cash owed to China; and they are still calling the shots, wtf...
the sad thing is the fact that the name United Nations, is exactly self defeating... anything but united, as the shots being made are still based according to the more powerfull (economic, millitary whatever) nations' policies. not taking the rest of the world into account, like for example third world countries that actually needs serious help like Africa are not even on the radar..shit guys
Its stuff like globalization and the digital divide together with the lack of exposure that creates a massive imbalance, giving the elite a chance of performing 'state policy 'legitimately'. Countries such as African or other third world counries is becoming the like the pavement special puppy running after a sports car, not knowing what to do with it when we get it.
Oh, and just a reminder take media (including internet sources) into account when making judgements regarding desicions made by 'smaller' countries, as subjectivity/objectivity and, like in the case of countries falling behind in terms of technology, lack of exposure (have some sympathy, the only news those guys get is from their (in most cases) corrupt government radio or sometimes anti-colonial (anti-globalization) grand parents- sometimes result in being racist) and just pure ignorance.
— AnonymousThird world spectator
30, 2009
03:52 am
Link
Israel could have made peace with all it's neighbours since a long time as de facto it has been recognized by the majority of the arab states.
— Not so crazy ArabBut unfortunately it has chosen the wrong way by stealing more and more land in the occupied territories and sending crazy ass settlers there...
02, 2009
12:28 pm
Link
israel could also have used nuclear weapons against the arab countrys in the last 40+ years.
— Anonymous30, 2009
01:22 am
Link
Forget about the "crazy Arabs" and just go and read the ideology of these highly civilized zionists, the list is long but check out these statements and see their logic:
"Spirit the penniless population across the frontier by denying it employment... Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly." Theodore Herzl, founder of the World Zionist Organization, speaking of the Arabs of Palestine,Complete Diaries, June 12, 1895 entry.
"Why should the Arabs make peace? If I was an Arab leader I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural: we have taken their country. Sure, God promised it to us, but what does that matter to them? Our God is not theirs. We come from Israel, it's true, but two thousand years ago, and what is that to them? There has been anti-Semitism the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They only see one thing: we have come here and stolen their country. Why should they accept that? They may perhaps forget in one or two generations' time, but for the moment there is no chance. So it's simple: we have to stay strong and maintain a powerful army. Our whole policy is there. Otherwise the Arabs will wipes us out".(The Jewish Paradox by Nahum Goldman, p. 99)
"Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves ... politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves... The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country."
-- David Ben Gurion, quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky's Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan's "Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech.
"Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population."-- David Ben Gurion, quoted in The Jewish Paradox, by Nahum Goldmann, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1978, p. 99.
"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population." Israel Koenig, "The Koenig Memorandum"
"We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel... Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours." Rafael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces - Gad Becker, Yediot Ahronot 13 April 1983, New York Times 14 April 1983.
"The settlement of the Land of Israel is the essence of Zionism. Without settlement, we will not fulfill Zionism. It's that simple."
-- Yitzhak Shamir, Maariv, 02/21/1997.
"Everybody has to move, run and grab as many hilltops as they can to enlarge the settlements because everything we take now will stay ours... Everything we don't grab will go to them." Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, November 15, 1998.
"One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail." -- Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [Source: N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 1]
— Anonymous30, 2009
12:10 am
Link
Isreal is a theocracy, a Jewish state. The national flag bears the Star of David. Sure, there are elections, but there are millions of non-Jews who live in Isreal, including the Palistinians whose territory is constantly being absorbed by illegal settlements. I want to feel sympathetic toward Isreal. It should survive. But it cannot survive by subjugating others.
— Anonymous29, 2009
08:07 pm
Link
Some of the anti-israel stuff I'm hearing on here is shocking. Do your research. Israel has and will always be the homeland for the Jews. Zionism is not a new thing or something that came about after the holocaust. In fact, the first waves of mass Jewish immigration in RECENT history, Jews were kicked out and have returned to zion many times throughout the ages, was in the late 1800's., well before hitler.
Israel has NEVER launched a preemptive strike on any nation. Their army is called the Israeli DEFENSE force. It is not in place to nuke arab countries. THEY WOULD NEVER DO THAT. It's for their own protection and judging by the actions of Iran's maniacle leader and his nuclear aspirations, Israel needs all the weapons is can get it's hands on, FOR DEFENSIVE PURPOSES.
Judaism was around BEFORE islam and christianity. It is from the old testament, otherwise known as the Torah, where you even derive your religions from. JESUS WAS JEWISH! HE WAS A RABBI from bethlehem, a town in the west bank. Jews are the children of zion, aka present day israel, and this is where they belong. There has never been a time when Jews didn't live in Jerusalem.
THESE ARE FACTS PEOPLE! DON"T GET SUCKED IN BY THESE LIES.
— SalamSALAM SHALOM PEACE
13, 2009
04:58 pm
Link
Despite I'm agnostic, I respect all kind of religions and confessions. No offence but I think your claims are based on bad ideology and prejudice. Following your statements, I can subsequently affirm that many way before judaism there were pagan religions, concluding with their supremacy over monotheistic ones! Doesn't it sounds insane? Of course, it does!
— United Men vs ProfitThese kinds of reasoning are scaring and upsetting. It's not surprising there is still no peace in the world. Leaving in the 21st century, your assumptions look old and stale to say the least.
30, 2009
02:34 pm
Link
The problem with your logic and idealism is that you're assuming that everyone commenting on here actually believes in a religion or even a god.
I could care less which character was a rabbi and which piece of fiction was written first. Israel's existance is THE biggest dividing factor on earth today. The people that occupy and run that piece of land are some of the most sinister and manipulative bunch and need to be done away with. Just because Israel puts a religious symbol on their flag, such as the star of David, doesn't mean they are a peaceful people with good intentions. My guess is that it probably just adds to the tension.
If the world ever expects to obtain 'peace' the only way I can EVER see this happening is by believing in humanity itself. Not some made up fictional, limiting, elitist, wierd set of beliefs in something that has zero tangibility and is open to speculation and horrendous interpretation. That means giving up judaism, christianity, islam, wailing walls, crucifixes, pedophilia and all the other perverted practices.... and just living your life.
Or if you have such a hard time with that believe in Santa Claus or Mickey Mouse. There's no difference.
Israel has outlived itself. Time to fire up the bulldozers and put in a parking lot.
— Richard Smoker03, 2009
10:01 pm
Link
Thanks Easter Bunny...I feel stupider for having spent the time reading your ridiculous post, and wish I could have back the five minutes I spent puzzling over you nonsense logic. If you take out religion, what - please, tell me - exactly makes Isreal's existance 'THE' biggest dividing factor on Earth today? If it's not because Isrealis are Jewish, then what other problem to the anti-semites have?
As far as obtaining 'peace' - as you put it - your 'humanity' has led to serious breaches of the notion of peace. Ask any Hmong, Tibetan, or Russian Orthadox follower what happens when religion is ignored....there are many more examples, but I'll leave them out here.
One other thing - I bet many peadophiles (I'm sure you have a dictionary) consider themselves to be just living their lives, and dream of Mickey.
— Santa05, 2009
10:07 am
Link
If you're confused about my 'dividing factor' comment just read the posts here and elsewhere any time Israel is mentioned. It doesn't take a self prescribed genius to see what's written in front of them-even if you don't agree.
— Richard Smoker05, 2009
10:02 am
Link
Has your erection subsided yet?
— Ting Ba Dho01, 2009
08:27 am
Link
Sad.
— Chez01, 2009
04:39 am
Link
nicely put
for some who are still hesitant as to wether organised religions' incalcation of deities has ever been beneficial for post-tribal societies:
http://onebigtorrent.org/torrents/4661/Richard-Dawkins--The-God-Delusion...
— perceptiventity